NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

_______________________________

BAP NO. MW 05-054

_______________________________

Bankruptcy No. 03-47109-HJB

Adversary No. 04-4341-HJB

______________________________

MILLIVISION, INC.,

Debtor.

_______________________________

 DAVID W. OSTRANDER,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL GARDNER and ROY FURMAN,

Defendants - Appellants.

_______________________________

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court

for the District of Massachusetts

(Hon. Henry J. Boroff, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge)

_______________________________

Before

Lamoutte, Haines and Carlo, United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.

_______________________________

Melvin S. Hoffman, Esq. and Pamela A. Harbeson, Esq., on brief for Appellants.

David W. Ostrander, Esq., on brief for Appellee.

_________________________________

April 10, 2006

_________________________________

Per Curiam.

            Michael Gardner and Roy Furman appeal summary judgment entered in favor of trustee David Ostrander on his complaint seeking to avoid their security interest in the debtor’s assets pursuant to his 11 U.S.C. § 544(a) strong arm powers. We affirm.

            The bankruptcy court’s rationale is fully explicated in its written decision, Ostrander v. Gardner (In re Millivision), 331 B.R. 515 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2005). Judge Boroff thoroughly considered appellants’ arguments and laid each to rest, applying correctly this circuit’s summary judgment standard. Id. at 520.

            Where, as here, the lower court’s accurate, clearly articulated legal conclusions lay all appellants’ complaints to rest, nothing would be added by a lengthy recapitulation of fact or law on our part. We need not, will not, toot our own trumpet in view of these premises.

            For the reasons ably stated by the court below, its judgment is AFFIRMED.